Main Menu
 
   
 

 

 
 
     
     
 

ALL Material on Justice Junction is © Copyright 2000-2003 by Justice Junction and may not be used with the express permission of Justice Junction. All rights reserved.

Contact: Justice Junction

 
Searching the globe for ...truth, honesty, integrity and equality!
JonBenet Ramsey: Our Little Miss America
"The "New" Evidence: Who's DNA Is This?"
JonBenet’s body was found in the basement of her home, in a small room that the family used for storage. In a house as large as the Ramsey’s it has been said that no stranger could have found his or her way around the area without prior knowledge. There was a broken window in the basement that John Ramsey claimed he broke the past summer and had intended to deal with it, but just hadn’t fixed it. A blue suitcase sat directly beneath the open window, with a child’s book in it. An extremely crucial mistake, the BPD had leaked it out to the press that not only was the window too small for an adult to climb through, there were no footprints in the snow. In the new American Justice special, Detective Lou Smit shows how easily someone could have lifted the grate and slid down the window, jumping off the small ledge into the basement, only a few feet from the room where JonBenet’s body was found. A full grown man, six feet tall moved the grate and slipped down through the window easily. And the room where JonBenet was found was about 10 steps away. Another urban legend is that there were no footprints in the snow leading to the house. The reality is, at that time, the yard was not covered with fresh snow, and it was patchy and frosty. The “No footprints in the snow “story was made legitimate because the BPD released the statement that there were no footprints in the snow. It got picked up the world round and pointed to the Ramsey’s. There was no fresh coat of thick, powder snow on the ground that in a pristine crime scene might have shown distinct footprints. It would have been easy to walk through the yard and avoid the few cracked and icy patches of two-day old snow on the ground, pulling up the grate and slipping inside. In addition to the fact that there have been seen by law enforcement photos of the back door that have hand written notes, ”Note back door left open”. Evidence photos that I’m sure many people would love to see. Back door left open? I’ve never seen a more obvious sign of intruder than a police photo with that hand written comment. I tried to go back to the website I saw the photo on and it has been taken down. Someone is still trying to cover up the truth.

The BPD has finally agreed to work with Lou Smit, where as in the past, because of his convictions that the Ramsey’s are not the perpetrators of this crime, the BPD didn’t want his help. He was too biased. In fact, the BPD doesn’t want anyone’s help. They have never publicly acknowledged that their ineptitude and inexperience made it damn near impossible to find the killer.The BPD didn’t even want help from the FBI and The Serial Killer and Child Abduction Unit in Quantico, Virginia. When Lead Detective Steve Thomas went to the FBI briefings, the officials there were stunned by the information that had been presented. One FBI official said that if anything like this had happened in Quantico, “Thunder would be rolling down the halls” according to Thomas’s book. There has been new DNA evidence that is being tested to see if there is something that was overlooked in the frenzy to convict John and Patsy. There was DNA everywhere that has been overlooked and not properly tested. Lou Smit has brought that DNA evidence with him to be retested. His dedication to this case has never wavered, personal feelings aside, the man has never given up on finding the perpetrator of this crime. The DNA will be tested and with a new cast of Boulder law enforcement and politicians, they have pledged to find the killer.

How did JonBenet get downstairs without anyone knowing? According to “The Death Of Innocence” both John and Patsy said JonBenet went strait to bed, wearing white long john leggings and a red turtleneck top. While investigating the house, a red, balled-up wet turtleneck top was found on the counter of JonBenet’s bathroom. Someone changed JonBenet’s clothing before her death. Why? This obviously happened before she was killed, she was found in a white long john shirt with a decorative sequined star. If the red turtleneck was upstairs, someone changed her before her trip downstairs. Her long johns were stained over the crotch with both urine and several areas of red staining, according to her autopsy. This shows that her top may have been changed but most likely her pants were not.

On the dining room table there was a bowl with Patsy’s fingerprints on it, full of pineapple. According to JonBenet’s autopsy, she had a small amount of, “fragmented pieces of yellow to light tan apparent vegetable or fruit” which several leading forensics experts, including Dr. Cyril Wecht, a former president of both American Academy of Forensic Sciences and American College of Legal Medicine, concluded that the matter could have been pineapple. The only fingerprints on the bowl belonged to Patsy Ramsey. Patsy said JonBenet went strait to bed eating nothing at home. The autopsy findings show that the matter moving through her body could have taken about two hours for the pineapple to reach her small intestine. Who gave her that pineapple? Or did she just make the bad decision to go get a midnight snack and dump a can of pineapple in a bowl only Patsy had touched?

JonBenet told her friend Megan Kostinick that “Santa” had told her that he would make a special visit to her on the day after Christmas. Megan’s mother, Barbara, told JonBenet that Santa came on Christmas Eve, that night, not December 25. No, JonBenet insisted that Santa said it would be after Christmas, and it was a secret. After the crime, Barbara tried to get the police to listen to her story, but they didn’t seem interested. Did JonBenet see Santa at the mall or maybe another Christmas party? How many men dress up and play Santa at Christmas? Could that person have seen her in a pageant or riding her float? I believe that is possible and something the BPD neglected to investigate thoroughly. No one has investigated that theory. And I think many people would agree with that. What if it is was someone watching and waiting? The Steve Thomas book asserts that there is no way they could account for the whereabouts of the hundreds and hundreds of people who saw JonBenet on her float in the Christmas parade. Hundreds and hundreds of people aren’t suspects. Maybe just one person watching, waiting.

The note that was left on the stairs, as Patsy claims, was written on a pad that the BPD claimed came from a tablet that was in the Ramsey home, with a sharpie that came from a cup of pens and pencils directly below the phone Patsy used to call the police from. This, unfortunately for the Ramsey’s, turned out to not only have matched the pad of paper but experts have concluded that the sharpie used to make the pen was a pre 1978 ink based pen that had been purchased and used within 3 months of the testing. The sharpie ink was compared to the ink on the ransom note. A perfect match. The note was tested and analyzed by several experts, and all of them had the same unfortunate conclusion: Patsy Ramsey was the only suspect they could not completely rule out as the writer of the note. Many, many people were asked to give numerous samples of handwriting with both right and left hands. This is a common police procedure, called an exemplar, a way of eliminating suspects. The Ramsey’s took many, one of them in the comfortable, plush living room of a high-ranking member of the Boulder District Attorney’s Office. It has made me wonder: if I was a suspect in the murder of my daughter, would my handwriting sample be taken on a soft couch with a cup of coffee and a plate of cookies in front of me? Somehow, I doubt that would be the case. The bottom line is that the Ramsey’s were given preferential treatment because of their wealth and the lawyers that their money was bought with.

Finally, there was a Grand Jury. They had three options: indite a suspect, write a report, or do nothing. They chose to do nothing. With the power of the law behind them, they were derelict in their duty to help find the killer, by doing nothing. In my opinion, the Grand Jury was a political dog and pony show. Nothing more than an illusion to make the taxpayers think that the city of Boulder was trying to solve this case. Even writing a report to make public some of the evidence that could have helped to solve this crime was too much work for them. They had the power to help find the killer of this innocent baby and chose to do nothing.

   
     

This site was last updated on: Sunday, July 4, 2004 11:01 PM