|
| The
Crime Scene Evidence |
| The
murders themselves, the brutal way the couple were butchered
indicates that the killings were done out of rage. Nicole's
neck was cut from ear to ear, nearly severing her head from
her body. Ron Goldman had numerous stab wounds including 5 puncture
or "taunting" type wounds. Impersonal killings are
normally done quickly so as not to draw attention. They are
usually shot or stabbed once, maybe twice. A rage, or vindictive
killing such as Nicole and Ron suffered, were committed by someone
who hated Nicole, at the least was very angry with her. That
would mean that they knew her, so who, other than OJ, that knew
Nicole, would be angry enough, or hate her enough, to do what
was done to her? No one but OJ. |
|
|
|
|
| When
told of his ex-wife's death, Detective Lange took note of Simpson's
lack of emotion. Lange would later report that OJ reacted with
what could only be termed "mild shock" He reacted
in a manner of which someone who already knew the person was
dead. It didn't seem like a surprise to OJ. Lange would also
state later that after over 20 years on the force and investigation
over 100 murders, he'd seen alot of devastation. In nearly every
case the families of the slain victim would always asks "the
w questions", who, what, when, why and how. Simpson asked
none of these. |
| |
| Moments
after notifying the Brown family of Nicole's death, Denise Brown
( Nicole's sister) screamed over and over, "OJ did it!
OJ did it! He said he was gonna kill her and he did it!"
While this is not damaging evidence against OJ, it certainly
shows that Denise Brown had reason to believe that OJ was capable
of killing her sister. |
| |
| A
left hand glove is found at the Bundy murder scene. The gloves
themselves are not normal K-Mart gloves, but a $55.00 pair of
Aris Isotoner gloves, size extra large, a brand created specifically
for Bloomindales. Bloomingdale's has proven that Nicole Brown
Simpson purchased two pairs of these gloves from them on December
18,1990. An executive from Aris testifies that due to the blood
drying on the gloves, they had shrunk a full size. Though Simpson
claimed to never have owned a pair of these gloves, several
media pictures at different events over the years show him to
be wearing them. |
 |
| Bloody
shoe prints are identified at the crime scene as a size 12 Bruno
Magli shoe, matching Simpson perfectly. The shoes are another
rare and very expensive piece of evidence. A very limited number
of these shoes were imported into the US. Now, tell me, what
drug dealer do you know of, actually who else do you know of,
would commit murder in $55.00 gloves and equally if not more,
expensive shoes? I'm not sure what drug dealers are wearing
these days in California, but I'll bet they aren't dressed as
well as OJ. OJ claims to have never owned a pair of these specific
shoes, he stated that they were "ugly". However, several
pictures have surfaced and been proven to be originals, not
tampered with, that show OJ at several different functions,
different places, different times, with these exact shoes on.
Why would OJ lie about owning a pair of those shoes if indeed
he had nothing to hide? |
|
|
| Hair
in a dark knit cap found at the murder scene would prove to
belong to OJ Simpson. |
| Simpson's
hair was found on Ronald Goldman's shirt, even though Simpson
claims never to have seen, let alone met Ronald Goldman. |
 |
| A
key piece of evidence which, in my opinion, has been overlooked
by the prosecution, is Nicole's dog. This dog, an Akita, is
a family dog, a family pet, fairly big and more than likely
protective. If an intruder unknown to the dog would have been
inside the gate any time during the night, the dog would have
went ballistic and neighbors would have heard him bark. What
dog, any dog, small or large, would allow a stranger up to the
door, let alone inside the compound, without barking? Yet the
neighbors only heard the dog's sorrowful wail, a death cry so
to speak. Also, in the event that the intruder was unknown to
the dog and had attacked the intruder, wouldn't the intruder
have tried to protect himself. Here's a guy that's stabbing
Nicole Brown Simpson to death and this dog is just going to
stand there? No way. The intruder would have stabbed the dog
as well, or at the very least tried. That tells me that the
dog knew who it was in the court yard, knew him well and trusted
him. If you wanted to make it look real OJ you should have killed
the dog. |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
