Main Menu
 
   
 

 

 
 
     
     
 

ALL Material on Justice Junction is © Copyright 2000-2003 by Justice Junction and may not be used with the express permission of Justice Junction. All rights reserved.

Contact: Justice Junction

 
Searching the globe for ...truth, honesty, integrity and equality!
A Killer Among Us
Dr. Robin Cotton Explains Blood Sampling and Storage
When blood is drawn for testing by labs it's preserved with the chemical called EDTA, which stops the DNA in the blood from degrading. (Degradation is the breaking down of a chemical into its component parts over time.) Dr. Cotton explained that when she compared the degradation levels of Nicole's autopsy vial, she found that it contained more degraded blood that the blood found on Simpson's socks. The blood on the sock was fresher and much richer in DNA than the blood in the vial. It is impossible to raise DNA in blood once it's degraded, no if and or buts about it, it can't be done. According to OJ's defense team, the blood they contend was planted on Simpson's socks came from Nicole's autopsy vial. This has proven to be impossible by Dr. Cotton's testimony. If indeed the blood would have come from the autopsy vial, it would not have contained the rich DNA. Another words, the blood on the sock was much fresher as it spurted out onto Simpson's socks in the process of killing her, but the blood that was collected for testing was done two days later, therefore it wasn't as fresh, as Nicole had been dead for two days and the chemicals in her body had already begun to breakdown. If the blood splashed on Simpson's socks while in the process of killing Nicole, then he took the socks off and left them to air dry overnight, in an air-conditioned atmosphere, this condition is equal to a criminologist taking a swatch right after Nicole had been murdered, then letting it air dry. It was impossible for the blood that was found on Simpson's socks to have been planted.    
   
     

This site was last updated on: Sunday, July 4, 2004 11:01 PM