Main Menu
 
   
 

 

 
 
     
     
 

ALL Material on Justice Junction is © Copyright 2000-2003 by Justice Junction and may not be used with the express permission of Justice Junction. All rights reserved.

Contact: Justice Junction

 
Searching the globe for ...truth, honesty, integrity and equality!
A Killer Among Us
The Evidence At Rockingham

The evidence against OJ Simpson is far above damaging, it's downright convincing. The evidence at Nicole's house, the evidence in Simpson's own vehicle, at his own home. The eyewitness evidence, evidence over and over. A mountain of evidence. 

If after viewing all the evidence against OJ you still find reasonable doubt, then you simply aren't looking at the truth or refuse to see it. Nothing anyone ever says or does will convince you that OJ Simpson literally got away with murder. Even if OJ himself got on national tv and said "I'm guilty! I did it!" there would still be an excuse for him, a reason as to why he would confess. "They coerced him, or someone drugged him" some far fetched reason as to why OJ Simpson could not have killed these two people. Either way, I pity you because you are the type of person who is easily manipulated and taken advantage of. Take a look at the evidence - ALL the evidence without prejudice and then look Nicole Brown's and Ronald Goldman's families in the eye and tell them with 100% certainty that OJ Simpson did not murder their loved ones. 

Probably the most damaging evidence to OJ is the irrefutable DNA evidence found at the crime scene, at OJ's house, behind Kato's guest quarters, in his Bronco, and leading away from the Bronco, over a wall and into his own house. See crime scene photo's of blood found in OJ's Bronco.

The bloody right hand glove found behind Kato's guest house. The glove, defense team claimed, had to have been planted because as they claimed it was wet with blood when it was found. This was simply a twisting of words by the defense team to cast doubt on concrete evidence. What was actually said about the glove when found is that it was "glistening", not wet. An executive from Aris testifies that due to the blood drying on the gloves, they had shrunk a full size. Though Simpson claimed to never have owned a pair of these gloves, several media pictures at different events over the years show him to be wearing them. 

DNA evidence on both bloody gloves would reveal traces of Simpson's, Nicole Brown Simpson's and Ronald Goldman's blood. The gloves would also yield particles of Goldman's hair and carpet fibers from OJ's Bronco. Photo of the bloody gloves.
Bloody socks in Simpson's bedroom. The socks were brought up more than once by the defense who suggested that the blood was planted there by police. However, several DNA experts testified that the blood tested on the socks was "rich with DNA". The reference blood taken from Nicole's body contained "substantially" degraded DNA. Another words, the blood on the socks could not have come from the reference blood, therefore it couldn't have been planted. Read more about Dr. Robin Cottons testimony regarding the degradation of blood samples.
 
Simpson's Bronco would reveal much more than blood. The blood stains themselves would prove to be a mixture of Simpson's, Nicole Brown Simpson's and Ronald Goldman. Police also discover that the dome light in Simpson's Bronco had been removed. After searching the vehicle, police find the dome light under the passenger seat. The previous evening, after he had committed the murders and returned home, Simpson frantically looked for the light to replace it, but couldn't find it which explains the blood smears on the passenger side floorboard. Read more about the blood stains found inside the Bronco here and view the Bronco crime scene photo's.
 
Blood drops found between the Bronco and the Simpson gate. Blood found on the Rockingham driveway and the sidewalk. 
Exact matching footprint as those found at the Bundy crime scene were found in drivers side floorboard of Simpson's Bronco.
Blood found in the foyer of Simpson's home.
About a week before the murders Nicole realizes that someone has stolen a set of her keys. She tells family members over and over that OJ stole the keys. The keys are later found in Simpson's Bronco. When questioned about the possession of these keys, Simpson flat out denies any knowledge of having them, even though they were found in his Bronco. Taken from the Civil Trial transcripts:
Q. Do you have keys to the property? (Nicole's property)
A. None that I know of.
Q. In May of 1994, did you have any keys?
A. None that I knew of.
Q. When you say that you did not have keys to Nicole's that you knew of, do you have a belief that you had some keys to Nicole's house?
A. No, I don't know if - I have no knowledge of having any keys to Nicole's house.
Allan Park arrives with the limo to take Simpson to the airport. Park testifies that he buzzed more than once with no response. He waits so long that he calls his boss and inquires as to what he should do. He's told to wait. Suddenly Park sees a black man of Simpson's height and weight cross the driveway and walk into the house. Moments later OJ miraculously answers the buzzer. In the criminal trial OJ would claim that the figure Park saw wasn't him, that he'd overslept and was in the shower when Park arrived which is why he didn't open the gate. However, in the civil trial, Simpson would suddenly change his story and claim that yes it was him that Park saw, he'd been outside in the yard chipping gold balls. Why the change in stories? 
Kato hears three thumps against his bedroom wall. Thumps strong enough to rattle pictures on his wall. Which, in my opinion, were caused when OJ came over the fence in a hurry and fell up against the wall.

In the civil trial, Simpson would testify that he wasn't concerned about the noises Kato had claimed to hear. It would later be reported that Simpson had a rather nonchalant attitude to the noises that Kato heard. He wasn't concerned that someone could have gained access to his property? He wasn't concerned that there could have been an unknown intruder on his property with his oldest daughter staying there? He wasn't concerned for her safety? That someone may harm her? No, he wasn't. I submit that OJ Simpson wasn't concerned about the noises Kato heard because he knew that he had made the noises himself. 

Simpson claimed in the criminal trial that he had one cut on his hand (he also stated this in the statement he gave police). During the civil trial he testified that he not one cut on his hand before he left for Chicago. During the same deposition he stated that his finger had been bleeding, he went into the kitchen to get a paper towel to put on it to try to stop the bleeding. So which is it? Was it cut before he went or not? 

OJ stated in his civil trial deposition that he "didn't always let the drivers in." St. John testified that he "never had to wait at the gate " during the 100 times or better, that he'd picked Simpson up.

OJ stated that he didn't open the gate for the driver immediately because he was worried that his dog would escape onto the street. However, St. John testified that during the times he picked OJ up, he never say the dog leave the property. 

St. John also testified that Simpson never parked his vehicle on the Rockingham street as it was on the night of the murders. Simpson had stated that he routinely parked the Bronco on that street for the maid to use. However, several witnesses testified that Simpson never parked any vehicle on the Rockingham street, at any time.

When Kato and Park are helping load OJ's luggage into the limo in preparation for the trip to Chicago, both testified as to OJ's insistence of retaining the moon shaped bag himself. Both men took note of how adamant OJ was about getting that bag. When Kato reached for the moon shaped bag, OJ hastily stopped him telling him that he'd take care of that particular bag himself. Kato reported that the bag was very full.

 
   
     

This site was last updated on: Sunday, July 4, 2004 11:01 PM